[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ILC-Asia WG3] Minutes of the meeting
- Subject: [ILC-Asia WG3] Minutes of the meeting
- From: KURIKI Masao <masao.kuriki@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:07:27 +0900 (JST)
Here is the minutes of the 17th ILC WG3 meeting.
17th ILC Asian WG3
Date : May 18
Time : 15:00-17:00
Place : KEK 3rd building 7th floor meeting room
IPPAK (ILC Positron Project At KEKB) status KURIKI Masao
Current status of IPPAK is presented. The radiation safety
investigation was performed by the radiation science
department of KEK. According to the result, the experiment
does not break the radiation safety regulation, but the
radiation flux will be increased at some direction with a
large magnitude (1E+4). It can be decreased by inserting the
target into the dump pipe (30cm from the entrance) down to
4.6 times. With this condition, the total flux of the
experiment in a reduced version, will be 0.94 of that of the
normal dump. The target activation is also qualified. The
material is activated so much, but with a carefull material
handling and assume 1 hour cooling down time after each
shot, total dose at the finger is expected to be 0.1uSv.
Electron cloud head-tail instability OHMI Kazuhito
Threshold of the head and tail instability induced by the
elctron cloud in the positron damping ring was discussed. By
an analitical aproach, the threshold is proportional to the
motion frequency and inversely proportional to K and Q value
of the oscillating motion. If K and Q were constant, the
threshold will be proportional to the total current, that
does not make any sense. If K and Q were similar current
dependence as the frequency, the threshold becomes inversely
proportional to the total current, that is consistent to the
experimental result. According to the experiment in KEKB, the
threshold depend on the average current, rather than the
bunch current.
WG3 related part of WG1 discussion issue towards Snowmass KUBO Kiyoshi
ILC parameter related issue which should be discussed prior
to Snowmass was presented. The main effort in Snowmass will
be discussion to make a baseline design. In this view, kicker
study and IPPAK will be big contributions.
DR study framework towards Snowmass
DR study framework was presented. It was formed by the
discussion among the conveners and others based on the
Wolski's three step aproach. To organize many studies which
are required to determine the baseline configuration, task
forces for each study item are being formed. Eanch task force
is led by co-leaders who have responsibility to manage the
task force.
In the discussion, it was pointed out that some management
over or among the task forces is necessary. For example, if
some serious difficulty was found on a DR design, this design
could be removed from the list at that moment to save our
human resource. The over manegement have to make such
decision, or at least, lead such discussion.
Asian WG3 Action plan towards Snowmass
Action plans towards Snowmass was discussed. We have several
projects in the framework of the ILC WG3. Assuming results of
these studies, possible insistences on the base line design of
the ILC injector are discussed.
The kicker experiment at ATF can determine the primary (or
shortest) bunch spacing, which is one of the most important
parameter of the DR design.
IPPAK(ILC Positron Project At KEKB) can make a significant
impact on the positron production scheme.
Reported by KURIKI Masao
-------------------------------